Now Playing Tracks

The Sexual Objectification Checklist

truckerwhore:

isaywesay:

1. Does the image show only part(s) of a sexualized person’s body?

image
BMW

2. Does the image present a sexualized person as a stand-in for an object?

image

Four Loko

3. Does the image show sexualized persons as interchangeable? 

image

Mercedes Benz

4. Does the image affirm the idea of violating the bodily integrity of a sexualized person who can’t consent?

image

Duncan Quinn

5. Does the image suggest that sexual availability is the defining characteristic of the person? 

image

American Apparel

6. Does the image show a sexualized person as a commodity that can be bought and sold?

image

Red Tape Shoes

I know I have posted this before, but it’s so necessary to reblog.

(Source: )

Smith College will form committee to address anti-trans discrimination

gaywrites:

The Dean of Admissions at Smith College has announced that the school will form a committee to address discrimination against transgender applicants.

This move comes after Smith received intense backlash for refusing to accept an application from Calliope Wong, a trans high school student whose FAFSA form listed her as male. Smith students delivered more than 4,000 signatures to school officials demanding that trans women be treated equally in the admissions process.

“The more than 4,000 signatures on our Change.org petition show that support for treating trans women equally in Smith College’s admissions practices is strong, both within and outside of our school,” said Smith student Elli Palmer. “As a committee forms to address this issue, we will continue to advocate for a clear policy from Smith that fully protects trans women applicants from unfair and discriminatory obstacles during the admissions process.”

“No young woman should be denied the opportunity to learn simply because of who she is,” said GLAAD spokesperson Wilson Cruz. “That Smith is having this discussion and listening to the community is a positive step, but the school still needs to ensure that no transgender woman is denied the chance to apply. Then, Smith will once again be blazing trails for women and setting an example for educational institutions everywhere.”

Fantastic. Smith, you’re finally doing it right. Don’t let us down. 

Not reblogging this because I’m a Unicef advocate, just because I definitely like the conversation about slactivism…your likes on facebook pages and sharing pictures of bullied kids, abused animals, etc. etc. does NOT solve problems!

futurejournalismproject:

Likes Don’t Save Lives

UNICEF Sweden has a new ad campaign reminding people that while social media Likes are nice, what they really need is money to fund their vaccination campaigns.

As The Verge points out, “Facebook likes aren’t treated as currency in other commercial venues, so they shouldn’t be equated with charitable donations.”

And via The Atlantic:

In the beginning, organizations wanted you to like the heck out of their Facebook pages. Why? You know, community-building, awareness-raising, general “engagement”-upping…

…But one thing clicking “like” doesn’t do is, say, get malaria nets to African villages or boost funding for charity groups. And now that Facebook is nearly 9 years old and Twitter is 7, we’re seeing the inevitable backlash against social-media “slacktivism.”

Back to The Verge:

The campaign, created by ad agency Forsman & Bodenfors, takes a rather bold stance against the awareness campaigns that often spread across Facebook and other social media platforms. UNICEF officials acknowledge that such efforts can help introduce issues to a wider audience, though they fear that for most users, the action stops with the click of a button. To further stress this point, UNICEF Sweden released a bold poster alongside the video clips, saying that every like it receives on Facebook will result in exactly zero vaccinations.

That’s not to say “slacktivists” are a bad thing. Liking, sharing and reblogging do serve their purpose in bringing issues to a wider audience. But then what?

Last year, The Atlantic notes, Zeynep Tufekci, a sociology professor and a fellow at the Harvard Berkman Center for Internet and Society, had this to say:

What is called commonly called slacktivism is not at all about “slacking activists;” rather it is about non-activists taking symbolic action—often in spheres traditionally engaged only by activists or professionals (governments, NGOs, international institutions.). Since these so-called “slacktivists” were never activists to begin with, they are not in dereliction of their activist duties. On the contrary, they are acting, symbolically and in a small way, in a sphere that has traditionally been closed off to “the masses” in any meaningful fashion.

The goal then for those working in social media is to simultaneously help the “slacktivist” set help you by building out ambient awareness of an issue through the messaging you create, while also giving activists and more consistently loyal proponents direct calls to action be it donations, volunteerism, network building, etc.

Meantime, if you’re moved to Like a cause, consider volunteering your time and/or other resources to it as well.

The other two commercials in UNICEF’s campaign can be viewed at The Verge. — Michael

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union